From a most concerned old man,when reading about poverty and child abuse,in my part of our world.Who feels that parent,s should be restricted to a maximum family size of siblings?
Intelligent people tend to limit the size of their family to their means. Unintelligent folk tend to screw whenever they want and let the state pay for their family. Unless we limit those people who's gene-pool would naturally die out if they actually had to fend for themselves, we really will end up being part of an Idiotcracy.Who feels that parent,s should be restricted to a maximum family size of siblings?
Sorry but that abridges not only the concept of personal liberty but also violates the religious principles of the the largest single religious denomination in the world, amongst other objections.
I think education is and wider availability of affordable birth control are better options. Most people don't want more children than they can afford to feed. In poor areas of the world, they lack the education to practice natural planning techniques or to understand and use artificial birth control properly.
What would be the maximum size? I have three, would that be considered the max. If me and/or my wife didn't have to work then i would possibly have more.
As for the abuse and poverty, it will only stop when the law changes and the sentences are tougher for the abusers - an eye for an eye.
Most of the problems in the world are caused by over population.
I totally agree.
I don't like it when You get a large family who are claiming benefits, Both mum and dad aren't working and Our tax money is spent on paying for their food.
It's usually foreign People! Makes me so angry.